Start by separating knowledge from execution
If your AMC 10 scores sit around 75–95, it is tempting to look for a harder book or another complete paper. Sometimes you need more mathematical knowledge. Sometimes you already know enough to solve a missed problem, but choose an unnecessarily long method, drop a case or answer the wrong quantity.
The score range in this title describes a reader who may find the exercises useful; it is not a diagnostic category. The seven mistakes below are teaching priorities selected for this article, not a statistical claim about the most common errors in a student database.
Take your last marked paper and choose three questions you believe you should have solved. Before reading the solutions again, finish them without a time limit. If you can now solve them, investigate timing, recognition or execution. If you remain stuck, identify the first fact or idea you need to learn. Both outcomes tell you what to do next.
Seven mistakes, seven worked repairs
All questions and follow-ups in this lesson are original practice. Several are deliberately accessible: a repair drill isolates one decision so you can make it reliable before combining it with more difficult ideas. The final item is a scoring decision exercise rather than a conventional contest problem.
Attempt each question first. Then read the solution, explain the repair habit in your own words and try the follow-up before opening its answer.
Use a progress-based move-on rule
A timer cannot decide whether a problem deserves more attention; your progress matters. If you have a clear chain of steps and only need to finish a calculation, continue. If you have spent time rewriting the same equation without reducing the uncertainty, mark the question and move on.
In practice, keep a short note beside a slow problem: “tried factorisation; no integer factors” or “direct counting overlaps”. That note makes a later return more effective. You can try a different representation instead of restarting the same unsuccessful approach.
Do not use question position as a perfect measure of difficulty. A later question may match a method you recognise, while an earlier one may expose a personal gap. Use your own evidence: what do I know, what remains unknown, and do I have a useful next step?
Keep the scoring rule separate from intuition
AMC 10 awards 6 points for a correct answer, 1.5 for a blank and zero for an incorrect answer. If your chosen option has probability p of being correct, guessing beats a blank in expected score when 6p > 1.5, or p > 0.25. Official scoring source.
Do not turn that into “always guess after eliminating an option”. Four equally likely choices produce the same expected score as a blank. Three equally likely choices give a larger expected score, provided your eliminations are valid.
Aiming to maximise expected score also differs from maximising the chance of passing one fixed threshold. The AIME cutoff and score-calculator guide demonstrates both objectives with exact numerical examples. During a real paper, avoid assuming that every answer you felt confident about is certainly correct.
A seven-day repair cycle
| Day | Task | Evidence to keep |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Review a previous paper and choose two recurring issues. | Three concrete examples, including the first wrong step. |
| 2 | Study one issue using a worked example and fresh follow-up. | A short explanation of the recognition clue. |
| 3 | Study the second issue; keep the workload manageable. | A complete solution without relying on hints. |
| 4 | Mix both issues with unrelated questions. | Whether you choose the right method without a topic label. |
| 5 | Revisit earlier errors after a gap. | A fresh attempt, not copied working. |
| 6 | Attempt a suitable timed set or full mock. | Where time produced progress and where it did not. |
| 7 | Review, then choose the next repair cycle. | Which errors disappeared and which still recur. |
This is a suggested routine. If a conceptual gap is substantial, spend another cycle teaching it instead of forcing a full paper into the calendar. The goal is to make the next attempt more informative and your mathematical decisions more dependable.

Measure the improvement you are actually practising
Keep three measures alongside the total: the number of accessible questions answered accurately, the number of errors repeated from the previous review, and the number of questions you can now explain without a hint. These measures reveal whether a repair is taking hold even when a new paper is harder.
Correct guesses deserve review too. Ask whether you could justify the answer and whether the elimination was sound. A lucky choice should not silently become evidence that a topic is secure.
For your next session, choose one mistake from this lesson and solve three fresh problems that use the same idea in different settings. The AMC portal can support that focused practice. Return to a full mock once you have something specific to test.
Common questions
Does a score of 75–95 mean I lack the mathematics for AMC 10?
Should I focus only on the first fifteen questions?
How long should I spend on a question?
Should I practise with a calculator?
Will these seven repairs guarantee AIME qualification?
Sources & further reading
Official rules and programme details can change. Use the linked source for your exact course, competition or examination session.
- MAA current AMC rules and policiesScoring and calculator restrictions; the mathematical examples and study routine are original.

